Two OMB Officials Resigned Voicing Concerns Over Ukraine Aid Hold Official Testifies


Two OMB Officials Resigned Voicing Concerns Over Ukraine Aid Hold Official Testifies

Two officials at the White House Office of Management and Budget recently resigned while voicing concerns over the holdup on Ukraine aid, a career employee of the agency told impeachment investigators, according to a transcript of his testimony released Tuesday.

Mark Sandy, the only OMB official to testify in the impeachment inquiry, did not name the employees in question. He said one worked in the OMB legal division and described that person as having a “dissenting opinion” about how the security assistance to Ukraine could be held up in light of the Impoundment Control Act, which limits the ability of the executive branch to change spending decisions already made by Congress.

The other person, who resigned in September, “expressed some frustrations about not understanding the reason for the hold,” Sandy said.

Sandy, the agency’s deputy associate director for national security programs, testified on Nov. 16, and his remarks revealed some of the White House’s internal machinations when it came to blocking the money. Other White House officials have defied congressional subpoenas to participate in the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

The release of Sandy’s testimony came as House Democrats on Tuesday took steps forward in their impeachment inquiry into President Trump’s actions, with the judiciary panel scheduling its first hearing for December 4 and the budget panel releasing a report alleging the White House broke the law by withholding money from Ukraine.

The moves show the impeachment process quickly advancing beyond the hearings held by the House Intelligence Committee this month to proceedings that could lead to a formal vote on impeachment.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D., N.Y.), in a 13-page letter to Trump, gave the president until December 1 to decide whether he planned to participate in that panel’s impeachment hearings. Nadler’s committee has the power to draft the articles of impeachment against Trump.

House Democrats in September began an impeachment inquiry into Trump’s actions during the summer, alleging that he withheld security funding for Ukraine and a White House meeting for that country’s president until the new leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, agreed to announce investigations into Trump’s U.S. political opponents.

Current and former government officials have testified that they were alarmed about the White House’s decision to withhold the money, with some saying they feared that Trump was trying to pressure the Ukrainian government for his own political gain. Trump has denied wrongdoing and decried the investigation.

Sandy’s testimony is the first public confirmation that the dispute at the OMB over handling of the Ukraine aid became so intense that it contributed to resignations from the agency. In the transcript released Tuesday, Sandy said that he himself voiced concerns within the agency about whether holding up the Ukraine aid comported with the law.

“I just made a general reference to the Impoundment Control Act … and said that we would have to assess that with the advice of counsel before proceeding,” Sandy said in describing a conversation he had with a political appointee at the agency who was his superior.

Ultimately that political appointee, Mike Duffey, took over the process of signing off on the documents that held up the Ukraine money. Sandy told impeachment investigators that until that time, Duffey had voiced no interest in the process of approving apportionments.

Sandy said his own staff was “surprised and they were concerned” about the apportionment authority being removed from him, and that he was not aware of such a step happening before.

He testified that Duffey’s stated explanation was he wanted to learn more about the “accounts and the programs” at OMB, but that Sandy thought there were better ways to go about doing this. But, “I took him at his word,” Sandy said.

Duffey defied a congressional subpoena to testify in the impeachment inquiry.

In announcing the Dec. 4 hearing, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) sent a letter to Trump and asked whether he or his lawyer planned to attend and question witnesses.

“We expect to discuss the constitutional framework through which the House may analyze the evidence gathered in the present inquiry,” Nadler wrote. “We will also discuss whether your alleged actions warrant the House’s exercising its authority to adopt articles of impeachment.”

Last week, Trump said he would seriously consider responding to written questions as part of the inquiry, but he has not mentioned the idea since.

Trump on Tuesday gave mixed signals about whether the White House might participate in the process. In Twitter posts, he wrote, “I would actually like people to testify,” but he suggested he wasn’t allowing his top current and former aides to testify because it would set a dangerous precedent for future presidents.

“It is a Democrat Scam that is going nowhere but, future Presidents should in no way be compromised,” Trump wrote. “What has happened to me should never happen to another President!”

Democrats have tried to establish a timeline of events that show the aid money appropriated for Ukraine was withheld around the same time Trump was increasing pressure on Zelensky to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter. The House Budget Committee on Tuesday alleged in a report that OMB engaged in a “pattern of abuse” of its authority and the law in holding up the security assistance to Ukraine.

Two OMB Officials Resigned Voicing Concerns Over Ukraine Aid Hold Official Testifies

In findings based on documents turned over by the OMB, the Democratic-led House Budget Committee cites unusual steps the agency took over the summer as it moved to hold up nearly $400 million of State Department and Pentagon assistance for Ukraine that had been approved by Congress, including several discussed by Sandy in his testimony to congressional investigators.

These included putting Duffey in charge of signing off on spending in late July, after Sandy raised concerns, and delaying funds in a way that limited agencies’ ability to spend congressionally approved spending by the end of the fiscal year.

The latter move would be a violation of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which was passed in response to actions by President Richard M. Nixon. This was the law that Sandy told investigators an OMB legal division officer had voiced concerns about when resigning. Sandy said the official, who he didn’t name, did not agree with the position of OMB’s general counsel that withholding the money was legal.

On the morning of July 25, Trump and Zelensky spoke by phone, and Trump mentioned the possibility of Zelensky’s working with the U.S. government on an investigation into Biden and his son, according to a transcript released by the White House. Later that day, at 6:44 p.m., according to the Budget Committee report, an OMB career official signed a document formally withholding $250 million in Pentagon funds intended for Ukraine.

After this point, political appointees took over the process of approving the funds from career officials. The frozen aid was not released until Sept. 12, after House lawmakers were notified of a whistleblower report regarding the Trump-Zelensky call.

The committee’s report also said the OMB released only a portion of the documents the committee sought in a detailed request to the agency two months ago from committee Chairman John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) and House Appropriations Chairwoman Nita M. Lowey (D-N.Y.).

“After careful review of the materials provided to the committees, the Chairs have become more concerned that the apportionment process has been abused to undermine Congress’s constitutional power of the purse,” the committee report says.

The OMB declined to provide an on-the-record response to the committee’s findings, or to Sandy’s testimony.

HIGH FLYER Eerie Photo Of Star’s Death Explosion That Looks Like A Giant BAT In Space Revealed By Nasa

The White House’s pressure campaign against Ukraine was led in part by Rudy Giuliani, an outside lawyer for Trump. In an interview broadcast Tuesday by former Fox News Channel host Bill O’Reilly, Trump said he didn’t direct Giuliani to go to Ukraine to pressure Ukranian’s leaders to investigate Biden. He suggested that Giuliani might have tried to go to Ukraine on behalf of other clients, not himself.

“I know he was going to go to Ukraine and I think he canceled a trip,” Trump said in the interview. “But, you know, Rudy has other clients other than me. I’m one person.”

The House of Representatives is controlled by Democrats, and they could impeach Trump with a majority vote. That action is equivalent to indicting the president for a crime. The process would then move to the Senate, which is controlled by Republicans, and they would then hold a trial on the House’s charges. Removing the president from office would require the approval of two-thirds of senators, a threshold few observers think is likely to be met.

Two OMB Officials Resigned Voicing Concerns Over Ukraine Aid Hold Official Testifies


  1. There are some interesting times in this write-up however I don?t understand if I see every one of them center to heart. There is some credibility yet I will take hold viewpoint till I check into it even more. Excellent post, thanks as well as we desire extra! Contributed to FeedBurner too

  2. certainly like your website but you have to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I will certainly come back again.

  3. I?d have to talk to you right here. Which is not something I generally do! I enjoy reading an article that will certainly make individuals believe. Also, thanks for enabling me to comment!

  4. Wow! This can be one particular of the most helpful blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Actually Fantastic. I’m also an expert in this topic so I can understand your hard work.

  5. Thanks for helping me to acquire new concepts about pcs. I also have belief that one of the best ways to maintain your mobile computer in leading condition is to use a hard plastic-type material case, or shell, which fits over the top of one’s computer. These kind of protective gear will be model precise since they are made to fit perfectly over the natural housing. You can buy all of them directly from owner, or via third party places if they are available for your laptop computer, however only a few laptop could have a spend on the market. All over again, thanks for your points.

  6. of course like your website but you have to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I will definitely come back again.

  7. My brother suggested I might like this web site. He was once totally right. This publish actually made my day. You can not believe simply how so much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

  8. I have not checked in here for a while because I thought it was getting boring, but the last several posts are good quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  9. The following time I check out a blog site, I really hope that it doesn’t disappoint me as long as this set. I indicate, I know it was my choice to check out, however I really assumed youd have something intriguing to say. All I hear is a bunch of grumbling regarding something that you might deal with if you werent too hectic seeking interest.

  10. hello!,I like your writing very much! share we communicate more about your post on AOL? I require an expert on this area to solve my problem. May be that’s you! Looking forward to see you.

  11. I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this web site. I am hoping the same high-grade website post from you in the upcoming as well. Actually your creative writing skills has encouraged me to get my own blog now. Actually the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a great example of it.

  12. There are absolutely a lot of details like that to consider. That is a terrific point to bring up. I use the ideas above as basic motivation yet plainly there are concerns like the one you bring up where the most vital point will certainly be working in straightforward good faith. I don?t know if ideal methods have actually arised around things like that, yet I make sure that your task is clearly recognized as an up for grabs. Both young boys and also girls really feel the impact of just a moment?s satisfaction, for the remainder of their lives.

  13. Thank you for any other informative website. Where else may I get that kind of information written in such an ideal approach? I’ve a venture that I’m simply now running on, and I have been at the look out for such info.

  14. Hey there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any problems with hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due to no back up. Do you have any solutions to stop hackers?

  15. I cherished up to you’ll receive carried out right here. The cartoon is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish. however, you command get bought an nervousness over that you want be turning in the following. unwell no doubt come further before again since precisely the similar just about very frequently inside of case you protect this hike.

  16. Hello! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I truly enjoy reading your posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics? Appreciate it!

  17. hi!,I really like your writing very a lot! proportion we keep up a correspondence extra about your article on AOL? I require a specialist in this area to unravel my problem. May be that’s you! Taking a look ahead to look you.

  18. Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I will be grateful if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  19. I got what you intend, appreciate it for posting .Woh I am happy to find this website through google. “Those who corrupt the public mind are just as evil as those who steal from the public.” by Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno.

  20. I like what you guys are up too. Such clever work and reporting! Keep up the excellent works guys I¡¦ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my web site 🙂

  21. I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Great work!

  22. This could be the appropriate blog for everyone who hopes to discover this topic. You understand much its virtually difficult to argue together with you (not that When i would want…HaHa). You certainly put a different spin on the topic thats been discussing for several years. Excellent stuff, just fantastic!

  23. I have to show some thanks to you for rescuing me from this particular predicament. Because of surfing around through the world wide web and coming across concepts that were not powerful, I was thinking my entire life was done. Living without the solutions to the difficulties you’ve sorted out as a result of this posting is a serious case, as well as ones that would have adversely damaged my entire career if I hadn’t encountered your website. Your expertise and kindness in maneuvering everything was important. I don’t know what I would have done if I hadn’t encountered such a subject like this. I can also now look ahead to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this reliable and results-oriented guide. I will not think twice to refer the blog to any person who should have recommendations on this problem.

  24. You can certainly see your expertise within the paintings you write. The arena hopes for more passionate writers like you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. At all times follow your heart. “There are only two industries that refer to their customers as users.” by Edward Tufte.

  25. Terrific paintings! This is the kind of info that are meant to be shared across the net. Shame on the search engines for now not positioning this put up higher! Come on over and seek advice from my website . Thank you =)

  26. There are some intriguing points in this post yet I don?t recognize if I see every one of them center to heart. There is some legitimacy however I will take hold point of view up until I explore it even more. Good post, many thanks and also we want more! Added to FeedBurner too

  27. In the grand pattern of things you’ll receive an A for effort and hard work. Exactly where you actually misplaced me was first on all the particulars. As they say, the devil is in the details… And it couldn’t be much more correct here. Having said that, let me say to you what did give good results. The authoring is certainly quite persuasive and this is most likely the reason why I am making the effort in order to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, despite the fact that I can easily see the leaps in logic you come up with, I am not necessarily certain of exactly how you seem to unite the points which make your conclusion. For now I shall subscribe to your position however hope in the foreseeable future you actually link the dots better.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here