Ruth Bader Ginsburg

48
836

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Ruth Bader Ginsburg (/ˈbeɪdÉ™r ˈɡɪnzbɜːrÉ¡/, born Joan Ruth Bader; March 15, 1933)[1] is an American lawyer and jurist who is an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Ginsburg was appointed by President Bill Clinton and took the oath of office on August 10, 1993. She is the second female justice (after Sandra Day O’Connor) of four to be confirmed to the court (along with Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who are still serving). Following O’Connor’s retirement, and until Sotomayor joined the court, Ginsburg was the only female justice on the Supreme Court. During that time, Ginsburg became more forceful with her dissents, which were noted by legal observers and in popular culture. She is generally viewed as belonging to the liberal wing of the court. Ginsburg has authored notable majority opinions, including United States v. Virginia, Olmstead v. L.C., and Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc.

Ginsburg was born in Brooklyn, New York. Her older sister died when she was a baby, and her mother, one of her biggest sources of encouragement, died shortly before Ginsburg graduated from high school. She then earned her bachelor’s degree at Cornell University, and became a wife and mother before starting law school at Harvard, where she was one of the few women in her class. Ginsburg transferred to Columbia Law School, where she graduated tied for first in her class. Following law school, Ginsburg turned to academia. She was a professor at Rutgers Law School and Columbia Law School, teaching civil procedure as one of the few women in her field.

Ginsburg spent a considerable part of her legal career as an advocate for the advancement of gender equality and women’s rights, winning multiple victories arguing before the Supreme Court. She advocated as a volunteer lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union and was a member of its board of directors and one of its general counsels in the 1970s. In 1980, President Jimmy Carter appointed her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where she served until her appointment to the Supreme Court. Ginsburg has received attention in American popular culture for her fiery liberal dissents and refusal to step down; she has been dubbed “The Notorious R.B.G.” in reference to the late rapper known as “The Notorious B.I.G.“.[2]

Early life and education

Joan Ruth Bader was born on March 15, 1933, in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, the second daughter of Celia (née Amster) and Nathan Bader, who lived in the Flatbush neighborhood. Her father was a Jewish emigrant from Odessa, Ukraine, then in the Russian Empire, and her mother was born in New York to Austrian Jewish parents.[3][4][5] The Baders’ older daughter Marylin died of meningitis at age six, when Ruth was 14 months old.[1]:3[6][7] The family called Joan Ruth “Kiki”, a nickname Marylin had given her for being “a kicky baby”.[1]:3[8] When “Kiki” started school, Celia discovered that her daughter’s class had several other girls named Joan, so Celia suggested that the teacher call her daughter “Ruth” to avoid confusion.[1]:3 Although not devout, the Bader family belonged to East Midwood Jewish Center, a Conservative synagogue, where Ruth learned tenets of the Jewish faith and gained familiarity with the Hebrew language.[1]:14–15 At age 13, Ruth acted as the “camp rabbi” at a Jewish summer program at Camp Che-Na-Wah in Minerva, New York.[8]

Celia took an active role in her daughter’s education, often taking her to the library.[8] Celia had been a good student in her youth, graduating from high school at age 15, yet she could not further her own education because her family instead chose to send her brother to college. Celia wanted her daughter to get more education, which she thought would allow Ruth to become a high school history teacher.[9] Ruth attended James Madison High School, whose law program later dedicated a courtroom in her honor. Celia struggled with cancer throughout Ruth’s high school years and died the day before Ruth’s high school graduation.[8]

Bader attended Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, where she was a member of Alpha Epsilon Phi.[10] While at Cornell, she met Martin D. Ginsburg at age 17.[9] She graduated from Cornell with a bachelor of arts degree in government on June 23, 1954. She was a member of Phi Beta Kappa and the highest-ranking female student in her graduating class.[10][11] Bader married Ginsburg a month after her graduation from Cornell. She and Martin moved to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, where he was stationed as a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps officer in the Army Reserve after his call-up to active duty.[9][12][11] At age 21, she worked for the Social Security Administration office in Oklahoma, where she was demoted after becoming pregnant with her first child.[7] She gave birth to a daughter in 1955.[7]

In the fall of 1956, Ginsburg enrolled at Harvard Law School, where she was one of only nine women in a class of about 500 men.[13][14] The Dean of Harvard Law reportedly invited all of the female law students to dinner at his family home and asked the female law students, including Ginsburg, “Why are you at Harvard Law School, taking the place of a man?”[a][9][15][16] When her husband took a job in New York City, Ginsburg transferred to Columbia Law School and became the first woman to be on two major law reviews: the Harvard Law Review and Columbia Law Review. In 1959, she earned her law degree at Columbia and tied for first in her class.[8][17]

Early career

At the start of her legal career, Ginsburg encountered difficulty in finding employment.[18][19][20] In 1960, Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter rejected Ginsburg for a clerkship position due to her gender. She was rejected despite a strong recommendation from Albert Martin Sacks, who was a professor and later dean of Harvard Law School.[21][22][b] Columbia Law Professor Gerald Gunther also pushed for Judge Edmund L. Palmieri of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to hire Ginsburg as a law clerk, threatening to never recommend another Columbia student to Palmieri if he did not give Ginsburg the opportunity and guaranteeing to provide the judge with a replacement clerk should Ginsburg not succeed.[7][8][23] Later that year, Ginsburg began her clerkship for Judge Palmieri, and she held the position for two years.[7][8]

Academia

From 1961 to 1963, Ginsburg was a research associate and then an associate director of the Columbia Law School Project on International Procedure; she learned Swedish to co-author a book with Anders Bruzelius on civil procedure in Sweden.[24][25] Ginsburg conducted extensive research for her book at Lund University in Sweden.[26] Ginsburg’s time in Sweden also influenced her thinking on gender equality. She was inspired when she observed the changes in Sweden, where women were 20 to 25 percent of all law students; one of the judges whom Ginsburg watched for her research was eight months pregnant and still working.[9]

Her first position as a professor was at Rutgers Law School in 1963.[27] The appointment was not without its drawbacks; Ginsburg was informed she would be paid less than her male colleagues because she had a husband with a well-paid job.[20] At the time Ginsburg entered academia, she was one of fewer than 20 female law professors in the United States.[27] She was a professor of law, mainly civil procedure, at Rutgers from 1963 to 1972, receiving tenure from the school in 1969.[28][29]

In 1970, she co-founded the Women’s Rights Law Reporter, the first law journal in the U.S. to focus exclusively on women’s rights.[30] From 1972 to 1980, she taught at Columbia, where she became the first tenured woman and co-authored the first law school casebook on sex discrimination.[29] She also spent a year as a fellow of the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University from 1977 to 1978.[31]

Litigation and advocacy

Ginsburg in 1977, photographed by Lynn Gilbert

In 1972, Ginsburg co-founded the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and, in 1973, she became the Project’s general counsel.[11] The Women’s Rights Project and related ACLU projects participated in over 300 gender discrimination cases by 1974. As the director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, she argued six gender discrimination cases before the Supreme Court between 1973 and 1976, winning five.[21] Rather than asking the court to end all gender discrimination at once, Ginsburg

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

charted a strategic course, taking aim at specific discriminatory statutes and building on each successive victory. She chose plaintiffs carefully, at times picking male plaintiffs to demonstrate that gender discrimination was harmful to both men and women.[29][21] The laws Ginsburg targeted included those that on the surface appeared beneficial to women,

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

but in fact reinforced the notion that women needed to be dependent on men.[21] Her strategic advocacy extended to word choice, favoring the use of “gender” instead of “sex”, after her secretary suggested the word “sex” would serve as a distraction to judges.[29] She attained a reputation as a skilled oral advocate and her work led directly to the end of gender discrimination in many areas of the law.[32]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Ginsburg volunteered to write the brief for Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), in which the Supreme Court extended the protections of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to women.[29][33][c] As amicus she argued in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), which challenged a statute making it more difficult for a female service member (Frontiero) to claim an increased housing allowance for her husband than for a male service member seeking the same allowance for his wife. Ginsburg argued that the statute treated women as inferior, and the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 in Frontiero’s favor.[21] The court again ruled in Ginsburg’s favor in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636 (1975), where Ginsburg represented a widower denied survivor benefits under Social Security, which permitted widows but not widowers to collect special benefits while caring for minor children. She argued that the statute discriminated against male survivors of workers by denying them the same protection as their female counterparts.[35]

Ginsburg filed an amicus brief and sat with counsel at oral argument for Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), which challenged an Oklahoma statute that set different minimum drinking ages for men and women.[21][35] For the first time, the court imposed what is known as intermediate scrutiny on laws discriminating based on gender, a heightened standard of Constitutional review.[21][35][36] Her last case as a lawyer before the Supreme Court was 1978’s Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979), which challenged the validity of voluntary jury duty for women, on the ground that participation in jury duty was a citizen’s vital governmental service and therefore should not be optional for women. At the end of Ginsburg’s oral argument, then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist asked Ginsburg, “You won’t settle for putting Susan B. Anthony on the new dollar, then?”[37] Ginsburg said she considered responding, “We won’t settle for tokens”, but instead opted not to answer the question.[37]

Legal scholars and advocates credit Ginsburg’s body of work with making significant legal advances for women under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.[29][21] Taken together, Ginsburg’s legal victories discouraged legislatures from treating women and men differently under the law.[29][21][35] She continued to work on the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project until her appointment to the Federal Bench in 1980.[29] Later, colleague Antonin Scalia praised Ginsburg’s skills as an advocate, “she became the leading (and very successful) litigator on behalf of women’s rights—the Thurgood Marshall of that cause, so to speak”. This was a comparison that had first been made by former Solicitor General Erwin Griswold who was also her former professor and dean at Harvard Law School, in a speech given in 1985.[38][39][d]

U.S. Court of Appeals

Ginsburg was nominated by President Jimmy Carter on April 14, 1980, to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated by Judge Harold Leventhal after his death.[28] She was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 18, 1980, and received her commission later that day.[28] Her service terminated on August 9, 1993, due to her elevation to the United States Supreme Court.[28][40][41] During her time as a judge on the DC Circuit, Ginsburg often found consensus with her colleagues including conservatives Robert H. Bork and Antonin Scalia.[42][43] Her time on the court earned her a reputation as a “cautious jurist” and a moderate.[44] David S. Tatel replaced her after Ginsburg’s appointment to the Supreme Court.[45]

Supreme Court

Nomination and confirmation

Ginsburg officially accepts the nomination from President Bill Clinton on June 14, 1993.

President Bill Clinton nominated her as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court on June 14, 1993, to fill the seat vacated by retiring Justice Byron White. Ginsburg was recommended to Clinton by then-U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno[17] after a suggestion

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

by Utah Republican Senator Orrin Hatch.[46] At the time of her nomination, Ginsburg was viewed as a moderate. Clinton was reportedly looking to increase the court’s diversity, which Ginsburg did as the first Jewish justice since the 1969 resignation of Justice Abe Fortas. She was the second-ever female justice, and the first Jewish female justice.[44][47][48] She eventually became the longest-serving Jewish justice ever.[49] The American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary rated Ginsburg as “well

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

qualified”, its highest possible rating for a prospective justice.[50]

During her subsequent testimony before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary as part of the confirmation hearings, she refused to answer questions about her view on the constitutionality of some issues such as the death penalty as it was an issue that she might have to vote on if it came before the court.[51]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Chief Justice William Rehnquist swears-in Ginsburg as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court as her husband Martin Ginsburg and President Clinton watch.

At the same time, Ginsburg did answer questions about some potentially controversial issues. For instance, she affirmed her belief in a constitutional right to privacy and explained at some length her personal judicial philosophy and thoughts regarding gender equality.[52]:15–16 Ginsburg was more forthright in discussing her views on topics about which she had previously written.[51] The United States Senate confirmed her by a 96 to 3 vote on August 3, 1993,[e][28] she received her commission on August 5, 1993,[28] and she took her judicial oath on August 10, 1993.[54]

Ginsburg’s name was later invoked during the confirmation process of John Roberts. Ginsburg herself was not the first nominee to avoid answering certain specific questions before Congress,[f] and as a young lawyer in 1981 Roberts had advised against Supreme Court nominees’ giving specific responses.[55] Nevertheless, some conservative commentators and Senators invoked the phrase “Ginsburg precedent” to defend his demurrers.[50][55] In a September 28, 2005, speech at Wake Forest University, Ginsburg said that Roberts’ refusal to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearings on some cases was “unquestionably right”.[56]

Supreme Court jurisprudence

Ginsburg characterizes her performance on the court as a cautious approach to adjudication.[57] She argued in a speech shortly before her nomination to the court that “[m]easured motions seem to me right, in the main, for constitutional as well as common law adjudication. Doctrinal limbs too swiftly shaped, experience teaches, may prove unstable.”[58] Legal scholar Cass Sunstein has characterized Ginsburg as a “rational minimalist”, a jurist who seeks to build cautiously on precedent rather than pushing the Constitution towards her own vision.[59]:10–11

Sandra Day O’Connor, Sonia Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Elena Kagan, October 1, 2010. O’Connor is not wearing a robe because she was retired from the court when the picture was taken.

The retirement of Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in 2006 left Ginsburg as the only woman on the court.[60][g] Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times referred to the subsequent 2006–2007 term of the court as “the time when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found her voice, and used it”.[62] The term also marked the first time in Ginsburg’s history with the court where she read multiple dissents from the bench, a tactic employed to signal more intense disagreement with the majority.[62]

With the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, Ginsburg became the senior member of what is sometimes referred to as the court’s “liberal wing”.[29][63][64] When the court splits 5–4 along ideological lines and the liberal justices are in the minority, Ginsburg often has the authority to assign authorship of the dissenting opinion because of her seniority.[63][h] Ginsburg has been a proponent of the liberal dissenters speaking “with one voice” and, where practicable, presenting a unified approach to which all of the dissenting justices can agree.[29][63]

Abortion

Ginsburg discussed her views on abortion and sexual equality in a 2009 New York Times interview, in which she said about abortion that “[t]he basic thing is that the government has no business making that choice for a woman”.[66] Although Ginsburg has consistently supported abortion rights and joined in the court’s opinion striking down Nebraska‘s partial-birth abortion law in Stenberg v. Carhart 530 U.S. 914 (2000), on the 40th anniversary of the court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 (1973), she criticized the decision in Roe as terminating a nascent democratic movement to liberalize abortion laws which might have built a more durable consensus in support of abortion rights.[67] Ginsburg was in the minority for Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), a 5–4 decision upholding restrictions on partial birth abortion. In her dissent, Ginsburg opposed the majority’s decision to defer to legislative findings that the procedure was not safe for women. Ginsburg focused her ire on the way Congress reached its findings and with the veracity of the findings.[68] Joining the majority for Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 579 U.S. 15-274 (2016), a case which struck down parts of a 2013 Texas law regulating abortion providers, Ginsburg also authored a short concurring opinion which was even more critical of the legislation at issue.[69] She asserted the legislation was not aimed at protecting women’s health, as Texas had claimed, but rather to impede women’s access to abortions.[68][69]

Gender discrimination

Ginsburg authored the court’s opinion in United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996), which struck down the Virginia Military Institute‘s (VMI) male-only admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. VMI is a prestigious, state-run, military-inspired institution that did not admit women. For Ginsburg, a state actor such as VMI could not use gender to deny women the opportunity to attend VMI with its unique educational methods.[70] Ginsburg emphasized that the government must show an “exceedingly persuasive justification” to use a classification based on sex.[71]

Commissioned portrait of Ginsburg in 2000

Ginsburg dissented in the court’s decision on Ledbetter v. Goodyear, 550 U.S. 618 (2007), a case where plaintiff Lilly Ledbetter filed a lawsuit against her employer claiming pay discrimination based on her gender under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 5–4 decision, the majority interpreted the statute of limitations as starting to run at the time of every pay period, even if a woman did not know she was being paid less than her male colleague until later. Ginsburg found the result absurd, pointing out that women often do not know they are being paid less, and therefore it was unfair to expect them to act at the time of each paycheck. She also called attention to the reluctance women may have in male-dominated fields to making waves by filing lawsuits over small amounts, choosing instead to wait until the disparity accumulates.[72] As part of her dissent, Ginsburg called on Congress to amend Title VII to undo the court’s decision with legislation.[73] Following the election of President Barack Obama in 2008, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, making it easier for employees to win pay discrimination claims, became law.[74][75] Ginsburg was credited with helping to inspire the law.[73][75]

Search and seizure

Although Ginsburg did not author the majority opinion, she was credited with influencing her colleagues on the case Safford Unified School District v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009).[76] The court ruled that a school went too far in ordering a 13-year-old female student to strip to her bra and underpants so female officials could search for drugs.[76] In an interview published prior to the court’s decision, Ginsburg shared her view that some of her colleagues did not fully appreciate the effect of a strip search on a 13-year-old girl. As she pointed out, “They have never been a 13-year-old girl.”[77] In an 8–1 decision, the court agreed that the school’s search went too far and violated the Fourth Amendment and allowed the student’s lawsuit against the school to go forward. Only Ginsburg and Stevens would have allowed the student to sue individual school officials as well.[76]

In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), Ginsburg dissented from the court’s decision not to suppress evidence due to a police officer’s failure to update a computer system. In contrast to Roberts’ emphasis on suppression as a means to deter police misconduct, Ginsburg took a more robust view on the use of suppression as a remedy for a violation of a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. Ginsburg viewed suppression as a way to prevent the government from profiting from mistakes, and therefore as a remedy to preserve judicial integrity and respect civil rights.[78]:308 She also rejected Roberts’ assertion that suppression would not deter mistakes, contending making police pay a high price for mistakes would encourage them to take greater care.[78]:309

International law

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Ginsburg has also advocated the use of foreign law and norms to shape U.S. law in judicial opinions; this was a view that was not shared by some of her conservative colleagues. Ginsburg supports using foreign interpretations of law for persuasive value and possible

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

wisdom, not as precedent which the court is bound to follow.[79] Ginsburg has expressed the view that consulting international law is a well-ingrained tradition in American law, counting John Henry Wigmore and President John Adams as internationalists.[80] Ginsburg’s own reliance on international law dates back to her time as an attorney; in her first argument before the court, Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 (1971), she cited two

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

German cases.[81] In her concurring opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), a decision upholding Michigan Law School’s affirmative action admissions policy, Ginsburg noted there was accord between the notion that affirmative action admissions policies would have an end point and agrees with international treaties designed to combat racial and gender based discrimination.[80]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Notable cases

Other activities

Portrait of Ginsburg, c. 2006

At his request, Ginsburg administered Vice President Al Gore‘s oath of office to a second term during the second inauguration of Bill Clinton on January 20, 1997.[82] She was the third woman to administer an inaugural oath of office.[83] Ginsburg is believed to be the first Supreme Court justice to officiate at a same-sex wedding, performing the August 31, 2013, ceremony of Kennedy Center President Michael Kaiser and John Roberts, a government economist.[84] Earlier that summer, the court had bolstered same-sex marriage rights in two separate cases.[85][86] Ginsburg believed the issue being settled led same-sex couples to ask her to officiate as there was no longer the fear of compromising rulings on the issue.[85]

The Supreme Court bar formerly inscribed its certificates “in the year of our Lord”, which some Orthodox Jews opposed, and asked Ginsburg to object to. She did so, and due to her objection, Supreme Court bar members have since been given other choices of how to inscribe the year on their certificates.[87]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Despite their ideological differences, Ginsburg considered Scalia her closest colleague on the court. The two justices often dined and attended the opera together.[88] In her spare time, Ginsburg has appeared in several operas in non-speaking supernumerary roles such as Die Fledermaus (2003) and Ariadne auf Naxos (1994 with Scalia, and 2009), and spoke lines penned by herself in The Daughter of the Regiment (2016).[89]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

 

In January 2012, Ginsburg went to Egypt for four days of discussions with judges, law school faculty, law school students, and legal experts.[90][91] In an interview with Al Hayat TV, she stated that the first requirement of a new constitution should be that it would “safeguard basic fundamental human rights like our First Amendment“. Asked if Egypt

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

should model its new constitution on those of other nations, she said Egypt should be “aided by all Constitution-writing that has gone on since the end of World War II”, she cited the United States Constitution and Constitution of South Africa as documents she might look to if drafting a new constitution. She said the U.S. was fortunate to have a constitution authored by “very wise” men but pointed out that in the 1780s, no women were able to participate directly in the process, and slavery still existed in the U.S.[92]

During three separate interviews that were conducted in July 2016, Ginsburg criticized presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, telling The New York Times and the Associated Press that she did not want to think about the possibility of a Trump presidency. She joked that she might consider moving to New Zealand.[93][94] She later apologized for commenting on the presumptive Republican nominee, calling her remarks “ill advised”.[95]

Ginsburg speaks at a naturalization ceremony at the National Archives in 2018.

Ginsburg’s first book, My Own Words published by Simon & Schuster, was released October 4, 2016.[96] The book debuted on the New York Times Best Seller List for hardcover

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

nonfiction at No. 12.[97] While promoting her book in October 2016 during an interview with Katie Couric, Ginsburg responded to a question about Colin Kaepernick choosing not to stand for the national anthem at sporting events calling the protest “really dumb”. She later apologized for her criticism calling her earlier comments “inappropriately dismissive and harsh” and noting she had not been familiar with the incident and should have declined to respond to the question.[98][99][100]

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

In 2018, Ginsburg expressed her support for the #MeToo movement, which encourages women to speak up about their experiences with sexual harassment.[101] She told an audience, “It’s about time. For so long women were silent, thinking there was nothing you could do about it, but now the law is on the side of women, or men, who encounter

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

harassment and that’s a good thing.”[101] She also reflected on her own experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment, including a time when a chemistry professor at Cornell unsuccessfully attempted to trade her exam answers for sex.[101]

Personal life

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Martin and Ruth Ginsburg at a White House event, 2009

A few days after Bader graduated from Cornell, she married Martin D. Ginsburg, who later became an internationally prominent tax lawyer. Upon her accession to the D.C. Circuit, the couple moved from New York to Washington, D.C., where her husband became professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center. Their daughter, Jane C. Ginsburg (b. 1955), is a professor at Columbia Law School. Their son, James Steven Ginsburg (b. 1965), is the founder and president of Cedille Records, a classical music recording company based in Chicago, Illinois. Ginsburg is a grandmother of four.[102]

Vue Cinemas Hoping For Mid-July Reopening

After the birth of their daughter, her husband was diagnosed with testicular cancer. During this period, Ginsburg attended class and took notes for both of them, typed her husband’s dictated papers and cared for their daughter and her sick husband—all while making the Harvard Law Review. They celebrated their 56th wedding anniversary on June 23, 2010. Martin Ginsburg died of complications from metastatic cancer on June 27, 2010.[103] They spoke publicly of being in a shared earning/shared parenting marriage including in a speech Martin Ginsburg wrote and had intended to give before his death that Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered posthumously.[104]

Although Bader was raised in a Jewish home, she became non-observant when she was excluded from the minyan for mourners after the death of her mother. There was a “house full of women”, but Bader, as a woman, was excluded. Orthodox Judaism requires that 10 Jewish men (over the age of 13) be present for a minyan, and women are excluded from being counted. She notes that her attitude might be different, following her attendance at a bat mitzvah ceremony in a more liberal stream of Judaism where the rabbi and cantor were both women.[105] In March 2015, Ginsburg and Rabbi Lauren Holtzblatt released “The Heroic and Visionary Women of Passover”, an essay highlighting the roles of five key women in the saga: “These women had a vision leading out of the darkness shrouding their world. They were women of action, prepared to defy authority to make their vision a reality bathed in the light of the day.”[106] In addition, she decorates her chambers with an artist’s rendering of the Hebrew phrase from Deuteronomy, “Zedek, zedek, tirdof“, (“Justice, justice shall you pursue”) as a reminder of her heritage and professional responsibility.[107]

Following her appointment to the Supreme Court in 1993, Ginsburg deviated from court tradition by wearing a French robe d’avocat, as opposed to the traditional American judicial robe. The French robe differs from the American with its exposed buttons, open sleeves, standing collar, and white rabat. On the left shoulder of the robe are two buttons intended for the fastening of an epitoge, traditionally worn by French lawyers. In later years, Ginsburg would shift from the traditionally uniform white French rabat and begin wearing more varied and fanciful jabots, necklaces, and other forms of neckwear. Some time later, fellow female Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O’Connor would follow Ginsburg’s lead and begin wearing the French robe d’avocat as well.

Ginsburg has a collection of lace jabots from around the world.[108][109] She stated in 2014 that she has a particular jabot that she wears when issuing her dissents (black with gold embroidery and faceted stones) as well as another she wears when issuing majority opinions (crocheted yellow and cream with crystals), which was a gift from her law clerks.[108][109] Her favorite jabot (woven with white beads) is from Cape Town, South Africa.[108]

Health

In 1999, Ginsburg was diagnosed with colon cancer; she underwent surgery that was followed by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. During the process, she did not miss a day on the bench.[110] Ginsburg was physically weakened by the cancer treatment, and she began working with a personal trainer. Since 1999, Bryant Johnson, a former Army reservist attached to the Special Forces, has trained Ginsburg twice weekly in the justices-only gym at the Supreme Court.[111][112] In spite of her small stature, Ginsburg saw her physical fitness improve since her first bout with cancer; she was able to complete 20 push-ups in a session before her 80th birthday.[111][113]

Nearly a decade after her first bout with cancer, she again underwent surgery on February 5, 2009, this time for pancreatic cancer.[114][115] Ginsburg had a tumor that was discovered at an early stage.[114] She was released from a New York City hospital on February 13 and returned to the bench when the Supreme Court went back into session on February 23, 2009.[116][117][118] After experiencing discomfort while exercising in the Supreme Court gym in November 2014, she had a stent placed in her right coronary artery.[119][120]

Ginsburg’s next hospitalization would help her detect another round of cancer.[121] On November 8, 2018, Ginsburg fell in her office at the Supreme Court, fracturing three ribs, for which she was hospitalized.[122] An outpouring of public support followed.[123][124] Although the day after her fall, Ginsburg’s nephew revealed she had already returned to official judicial work after a day of observation,[125] a CT scan of her ribs following her November 8 fall showed cancerous nodules in her lungs.[121] On December 21, Ginsburg underwent a left-lung lobectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to remove the nodules.[121] For the first time since joining the Court more than 25 years earlier, Ginsburg missed oral argument on January 7, 2019 while she recuperated.[126] She returned to the Supreme Court on February 15 to participate in a private conference with other justices in her first appearance at the court since her cancer surgery in December 2018.[127]

Months later in August 2019, the Supreme Court announced that Ginsburg had recently completed three weeks of focused radiation treatment to ablate a tumor found in her pancreas over the summer.[128] On January 7, 2020, Ginsburg reported that she is cancer free.[129]

 

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

48 COMMENTS

  1. Pretty section of content. I just stumbled upon your web site and in accession capital to assert that I acquire in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I achievement you access consistently rapidly.

  2. There are some intriguing moments in this write-up but I don?t understand if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I will certainly take hold point of view up until I check into it better. Great post, thanks as well as we desire much more! Contributed to FeedBurner as well

  3. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again soon!

  4. Thanks for your article. It is rather unfortunate that over the last one decade, the travel industry has had to fight terrorism, SARS, tsunamis, flu virus, swine flu, and also the first ever real global economic collapse. Through it the industry has really proven to be powerful, resilient and also dynamic, discovering new ways to deal with hardship. There are constantly fresh problems and possibilities to which the sector must yet again adapt and respond.

  5. You actually make it appear really easy along with your presentation however I in finding this topic to be actually something which I believe I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very vast for me. I am having a look forward in your subsequent post, I’ll attempt to get the hang of it!

  6. Amalgam viva voce, this was less a positive of 2. [url=https://ciamedusa.com/#]canadian cialis pills[/url] The initiate should be the limerick preparation of tetanus.

  7. I was just seeking this information for a while. After six hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your site. I wonder what’s the lack of Google strategy that don’t rank this kind of informative sites in top of the list. Generally the top websites are full of garbage.

  8. Can-C 1 N-acetylcarnosine eye is adamant holocaust perfectly to people [url=https://ciamedusa.com/#]buy tadalafil online canada[/url] wait, inferior cialis online canadian pharmacy, whatever channel, antagonism.

  9. Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your web-site is very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you’ve on this web site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found just the info I already searched everywhere and simply couldn’t come across. What a perfect site.

  10. I have seen a lot of useful elements on your web page about personal computers. However, I’ve the impression that laptop computers are still not nearly powerful enough to be a sensible choice if you typically do tasks that require many power, including video touch-ups. But for website surfing, microsoft word processing, and a lot other popular computer functions they are fine, provided you never mind the small screen size. Thank you sharing your notions.

  11. Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your favorite justification appeared to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  12. I will immediately grab your rss feed as I can’t in finding your e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please allow me recognize in order that I could subscribe. Thanks.

  13. Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely glad I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back often!

  14. F*ckin’ amazing issues here. I am very happy to see your article. Thank you a lot and i am having a look forward to touch you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?

  15. excellent post, very informative. I wonder why the other experts of this sector don’t notice this. You must continue your writing. I am confident, you have a huge readers’ base already!

  16. I’ve learned some important things by means of your post. I would also like to mention that there may be situation where you will obtain a loan and never need a co-signer such as a Government Student Aid Loan. But if you are getting that loan through a conventional bank then you need to be willing to have a cosigner ready to help you. The lenders will certainly base their own decision on a few issues but the most significant will be your credit rating. There are some loan companies that will as well look at your job history and determine based on this but in almost all cases it will depend on your credit score.

  17. It¡¦s really a great and helpful piece of information. I¡¦m happy that you just shared this useful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  18. I have observed that in the world the present day, video games include the latest trend with kids of all ages. Often times it may be not possible to drag your family away from the activities. If you want the very best of both worlds, there are various educational activities for kids. Interesting post.

  19. I do believe all of the concepts you have presented on your post. They’re really convincing and can definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very brief for newbies. May just you please prolong them a little from next time? Thanks for the post.

  20. Just want to say your article is as astounding. The clarity for your put up is just cool and that i could think you are a professional in this subject. Fine together with your permission let me to clutch your feed to stay updated with impending post. Thank you one million and please carry on the enjoyable work.

  21. I simply had to appreciate you once more. I’m not certain the things that I would’ve used in the absence of the actual information revealed by you over this theme. It was a real frustrating circumstance for me personally, nevertheless taking note of a skilled fashion you managed it forced me to leap for gladness. I’m grateful for this advice and even pray you comprehend what an amazing job you are getting into teaching many others via your web blog. More than likely you have never met any of us.

  22. Aw, this has been an exceptionally good post. In concept I would like to place in writing similar to this moreover – spending time and actual effort to have a really good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something completed.

  23. Generally speaking, women would want to look lovely and eye-catching always. This is one reason why even the eyelashes can now be improved by way of making use of eyelash lengtheners. These are goods that may help any women attain fuller, thicker and lengthier eyelashes that could absolutely capture anybody’s attention. These items have been guaranteed safe, efficient and inexpensive provided that the suitable product is picked and bought.

  24. I’m now not sure where you’re getting your information, however good topic. I needs to spend some time finding out more or working out more. Thank you for fantastic information I used to be on the lookout for this information for my mission.

  25. Great work! This is the kind of information that should be shared across the web. Shame on search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and consult with my site . Thank you =)

  26. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your site in my social networks!

  27. Howdy very cool blog!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds also…I’m glad to seek out so many useful information right here in the put up, we need develop extra techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  28. Hey there are using WordPress for your site platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here