England v West Indies Dropping Stuart Broad Looks Like A Mistake


England v West Indies Dropping Stuart Broad Looks Like A Mistake

These days, England players are encouraged to be open, honest and speak their minds.

It is good that they are, because it certainly would not have happened 10 years ago.

When Stuart Broad was asked how it felt to have been left out of this first Test against West Indies, he could have trotted out the usual lines about how he is “backing up the lads”, but he would not have meant it.

Instead, he said he was “angry, frustrated and gutted”. I’m not sure a young cricketer in Broad’s position would have said the same thing, but he has been around for a long time and clearly feels very strongly.

When you take into account what Broad has achieved in the past year, it is a pretty brutal decision. Twelve Tests, 48 wickets at an average of 23.

Not only that, but you suspect Broad would have bowled beautifully in the grey, damp conditions England were presented with on the first morning in Southampton. With Broad in the side, England may have chosen to exploit those conditions, rather than opting to bat first.

  • I understand the arguments for the attack England have chosen, putting the extra pace of Mark Wood and Jofra Archer alongside James Anderson.

    Part of the job of the selectors is to have an eye on the future, and England will have thoughts of the next Ashes series in Australia, in 2011-22, in mind. We cannot complain that England have no pace bowlers, and also when their fastest bowlers get picked.

    On top of that, stand-in skipper Ben Stokes was faced with a dry pitch, one that might go up and down late in this Test. If that is the case, the extra pace of Archer and Wood could be very effective.

    But you have to be in the game when the fourth and fifth days come around. You also want to put a marker down and win the first Test in a series.

    England face a battle to do both of those things, and for that reason you have to think they made a mistake.

    Broad, 34, said he was pleased he felt so disappointed to be left out, otherwise he might have a decision to make about his future.

    He will be realistic. He will see how much he plays this summer, and how well he bowls when his chance comes.

    After seeing three days of behind-closed-doors cricket, it may be in the back of his mind, and of 37-year-old Anderson, that a farewell without spectators would be no farewell at all.

    That, though, is for the future, because the conversation surrounding Broad should not detract from the state of the match, with England in trouble 99 runs behind, even if they still have all 10 second-innings wickets in hand.


    https://www.bbc.comIn some ways, you do not want to be over-critical of the players, because their preparation has been short and they are lacking the lift a crowd can give them.

    But the West Indies players are in exactly the same situation, and they have shown that discipline and a willingness to knuckle down can still lead to a good performance.

  • Trump Says He Is Not Thinking About A Phase 2 U.S. China Trade Deal

    In that sense, it has not been a good display from England. They batted poorly in the first innings, then offered up too many loose deliveries for West Indies to capitalise on.

    In contrast, the tourists bowled well and grafted with the bat. They have shown all the qualities that impressed us when they won in the Caribbean at the beginning of 2019.

    Now, England find themselves having to make at least 270

England v West Indies Dropping Stuart Broad Looks Like A Mistake



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here